Transportation

 

California has had a legendary, and rocky, love affair with the automobile since they first started rolling off the assembly line in the early 1900’s. But our state’s car culture has also contributed to some of the worst air quality in the nation, endangering Californians’—and the planet’s—health. In addition, heavy-duty vehicles like trucks and buses and off-road sources such as construction and agricultural equipment are the largest contributors to vehicle-related smog-forming emissions. California needs to improve mobility for its citizens and its goods while simultaneously reducing the environmental effects of the transportation sector.

The solutions must include investment in new, less-polluting technologies, “smart growth” strategies such as building housing near dense urban centers and public transit options, and investments in infrastructure and alternative forms of transportation, including sidewalks and other footpaths, dedicated bicycle and carpool lanes, and public transit options such as buses, trains, and ferries. But declining revenues from traditional funding sources (including, importantly, the gas tax) have hindered the state’s ability to invest in improved transportation networks.

California is a leader in designing policies to reduce emissions from transportation sources. Beginning in the 1990’s, with increasing recognition that traffic congestion and air pollution required investments in alternative forms of transportation, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) began to emphasize integration between highways and other modes of transportation. Many states have chosen to follow California’s emissions standards for passenger vehicles, which are more stringent than federal standards. More recently, the state has launched programs to limit emissions by reducing the carbon content of transportation fuels and by encouraging people to drive less. However, many of California’s urban areas—including Los Angeles, San Francisco-Oakland, San Diego, San Jose and San Bernardino-Riverside—continue to top the lists of the most congested in the nation, and 60 percent of California’s urban highways are congested.

Of course, population growth plays a major role in California’s transportation challenges. According to the US Census, California’s population exceeded 38 million in 2008—nearly 12% more people than in 2000. The state’s population increased 42% between 1980 and 2000, from 24 million residents to 34 million. Meanwhile, vehicle miles of travel increased 27% between 1990 and 2005; vehicle miles of travel are projected to increase another 63% by the year 2025. The population boom, increased goods movement traffic, and resulting increase in vehicle miles traveled, along with the urgency to reduce emissions and curb global warming, requires California’s elected leaders to develop innovative solutions, including funding solutions, to these challenges.

We are working with our sister organization, the National LCV, to make sure that transit funding is prioritized over more handouts to Big Oil.

Transportation Votes

Year Bill # Description Assembly Senate Governor
2014 SB 1204 Cleaner trucks & buses
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
2014 SB 1275 A million clean cars
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
2013 SB 1 New options for transit-oriented development
Good
Good
Good
Good
No Action
No Action
2013 SB 448 Preventing oil companies’ market manipulation
Good
Good
Good
Good
Bad
Bad
2013 AB 8 Investing in cleaner cars
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
2012 SB 1156 New options for transit-oriented development
Good
Good
Good
Good
Bad
Bad
2011 AB 650 Roadmap to better public transportation
Good
Good
Good
Good
Bad
Bad
2011 AB 710 Pushing the parking envelope
Good
Good
Bad
Bad
No Action
No Action
2011 SB 582 Commuter dividends: pollution and pocketbook savings
Good
Good
Good
Good
Bad
Bad
2010 AB 234 To boom, or not to boom?
Good
Good
Good
Good
Bad
Bad
2010 AB 2289 All Onboard with Smog Checks
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
2010 SB 346 Putting the brakes on urban water pollution
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
2008 SB 974 Ports, pollution, & cleaner communities (2008)
Good
Good
Good
Good
Bad
Bad
2008 AB 2522 Cleaning up cars in the Valley
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
2007 AB 118 Investing in alternative fuels & clean air
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
2007 SB 210 Carbon out of fuels
Good
Good
Good
Good
Bad
Bad
2006 SB 459 Tackling railroad emissions
Bad
Bad
No Action
No Action
No Action
No Action
2006 AB 1012 Clean vehicles for California
Good
Good
Good
Good
Bad
Bad
2006 SB 757 Cutting the petroleum umbilical
Good
Good
Good
Good
Bad
Bad
2005 SB 757 Promoting alternative fuels and reducing petroleum dependence
Bad
Bad
Good
Good
No Action
No Action
 
 
 

Take Action »

Be an environmental champion: take action to protect our air, water, and health.

Know Your Legislators »

Who represents you in the Assembly & State Senate? Find out how they voted on key environmental proposals.

Stay Connected »

Keep up with the latest from CLCV: environmental news, urgent action alerts, and more.

Donate »

Your support for CLCV helps maintain California's standing as the nation's environmental leader.

2018 California Environmental Scorecard

New for the 2018 legislative session: The 45th annual California Environmental Scorecard rates elected officials on 2018, another successful year for the environment in spite of heavy opposition from polluting industry.

Find out how your legislators did in 2018 in CLCV's California Environmental Scorecard.